RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of first- and second-line interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from 2014 to 2021, using data from the Danish Rheumatology Registry (DANBIO) by investigating adherence to therapy. METHOD: PsA patients recorded in DANBIO who received a first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment were included in this study. All patients included had previously received ≥1 TNFi treatment. Baseline characteristics were analyzed in subgroups: first-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment and second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment. adherence to therapy of first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatments were reported as Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: 534 patients were included in the study; first-line switchers: 534 (secukinumab: 510, ixekizumab: 24), second-line switchers: 102 (secukinumab: 35, ixekizumab: 67). Baseline characteristics showed a similar Health Assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain. VAS global, Disease Assessment Score-28CRP and previous number of bDMARD treatments are similar with a greater value for second-line switchers. First-line ixekizumab treated patients present a younger age, greater percentage of females, a lower disease duration and a lower CRP value. Concomitant MTX use was greater for the first-line secukinumab treated patients. First- and second-line switchers had a similar adherence to therapy. Second-line secukinumab and second-line ixekizumab switchers showed a similar adherence to treatment. CONCLUSION: PsA patients receiving first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitors showed homogeneous baseline characteristics and similar adherence to therapy. Treatment failure of the first IL-17A inhibitor treatment should not preclude a second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment.
RESUMO
The real-world efficacy of biologics may be insufficiently assessed through common drug survival studies. The objective was thus to examine the real-world performance of biologics in the treatment of psoriasis using the composite endpoint of either discontinuation or off-label dose escalation. Using a prospective nationwide registry (DERMBIO, 2007-2019), we included patients with psoriasis treated with adalimumab, secukinumab, and/or ustekinumab, which have all been used as first-line therapy during the inclusion period. The primary endpoint was a composite of either off-label dose escalation or discontinuation of treatment, whereas the secondary outcomes were dose escalation and discontinuation, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the presentation of unadjusted drug survival curves. Cox-regression models were used for risk assessment. In 4,313 treatment series (38.8% women, mean age 46.0 years, and 58.3% bio-naivety), we found that the risk of the composite endpoint was lower for secukinumab when compared with ustekinumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.76), but higher for adalimumab (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26). However, the risk of discontinuation was higher for secukinumab (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42) and adalimumab (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.82-2.22). For bio-naive patients treated with secukinumab, the risk of discontinuation was comparable to that of ustekinumab (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.61-1.49).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Comorbidities associated with psoriasis are well documented. However, few studies have explored the comorbidity trajectories that patients with psoriasis commonly experience over time. This study reports the 5-year comorbidity trajectories of patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term comorbidity trajectories of patients with psoriasis in Denmark. METHODS: This observational cohort study explored the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 1999 and 2013 to identify comorbidities diagnosed 5â years prior to or after a psoriasis diagnosis. Comorbidity occurrence in patients with psoriasis (psoriasis cohort) was compared with patients without psoriasis (the N group). Comparison groups, each the same size as the psoriasis cohort, were created by selecting random patients from the N group. If a comorbidity occurrence was higher in more than nine comparison groups than in the psoriasis cohort, it was not analysed and only comorbidities that occurred in ≥ 0·8% of the psoriasis cohort were analysed. The strength of association between a psoriasis diagnosis and a comorbidity diagnosis was measured using relative risk (RR). All psoriasis and comorbidity pairs that achieved RR > 1 (P < 0·001) (known as a Diagnosed Pair) were tested for directionality to identify the sequence of diagnoses using a binomial test. Diagnosed Pairs with a statistically significant direction (Bonferroni corrected P-value < 0·025) were then used to create comorbidity trajectory clusters 5â years before and after a psoriasis diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 17 683 patients with psoriasis were compared with 10 000 comparison groups. A total of 121 comorbidities met the minimum criteria that ≥ 0·8% of the psoriasis cohort were diagnosed with the comorbidity within 5â years (before or after) of their psoriasis diagnosis. Thirty-eight of these comorbidities achieved RR > 1 (P < 0·001) with psoriasis, of which 19 achieved a significant direction from psoriasis to a comorbidity (including psoriasis to hypothyroidism), and four achieved a significant direction from a comorbidity diagnosis to a psoriasis diagnosis (including Crohn disease to psoriasis); four of five comorbidity trajectories with three sequential diagnoses achieved an RR > 1 (P < 0·001) and a significant direction from psoriasis to the first comorbidity to the second comorbidity (including psoriasis to hypertension to atrial fibrillation and flutter). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity trajectories may support clinicians in conducting disease risk analyses of patients with psoriasis and help plan optimal treatment to prevent future high-risk comorbidities.
